🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.